All about business

Judge freezes Stanford’s assets

A federal judge has granted the U.S. government’s request to indefinitely freeze the assets of Allen Stanford, and three of his companies, as the Texas financier is accused of running a massive Ponzi scheme.

U.S. District Judge David Godbey also agreed to release most brokerage accounts over $250,000 that have been frozen since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission accused Stanford of an $8 billion fraud scheme involving certificates of deposit.

At a brief hearing in federal court in Dallas, Godbey agreed to the SEC’s request for a preliminary injunction that freezes Stanford assets until a trial in the civil lawsuit is complete. The three group companies involved are Stanford International Bank, Stanford Group Co. and Stanford Capital Management. The original temporary restraining order freezing the assets was set to expire on Thursday.

Godbey also approved a plan submitted by court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey to release most customer brokerage accounts with a net asset value of $250,000 or more, brokerage accounts held by JPMorgan Clearing Corp and brokerage accounts managed by Stanford companies.

Hundreds of Stanford investors have sued Janvey to get access to their accounts.

The release would affect about 16,000 accounts with about $4.1 billion in assets, with about 4,000 accounts with assets of $1.8 billion still subject to the freeze, based on data in court document filed by Janvey.

Accounts with net assets of less than $250,000 held at Pershing LLC have already been released bad credit payday advance.

Stanford and his top aide, James Davis, are accused by the SEC of a massive Ponzi scheme involving high-yield certificates of deposit (CDs) issued by Stanford’s offshore bank in Antigua.

Both have asserted their constitutional right to avoid self-incrimination and have declined to cooperate in the government’s probe.

Charles Meadows, a Dallas-based lawyer who had previously represented Stanford, said in a recent filing that the allegations against his client are "false and the SEC has presented no evidence of any such Ponzi scheme." Meadows on Thursday filed notice that he no longer represents Stanford, leaving Stanford’s legal representation unclear.

Janvey has been enforcing a court-ordered freeze of Stanford funds since February as a means of preserving assets for investors and creditors.

Many Stanford customers who have been barred from accessing their accounts have argued in court that the freeze is causing them undue hardship, leaving them unable to pay mortgages, medical bills and daily expenses.

Accounts that remain frozen include those related to the CDs issued by Stanford’s offshore bank and those controlled by defendants or some employees. 

Source

Dieser Beitrag wurde am Sunday, 15. March 2009 um 01:39 Uhr veröffentlicht und wurde unter der Kategorie news abgelegt. Du kannst die Kommentare zu diesen Eintrag durch den RSS-Feed verfolgen.

« U.S. retail sales dip less than expected – Turkish Central Bank Likely to Cut Benchmark Rate: Week Ahead »

No Comments

No comments yet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 

Powered by WordPress -- XHTML 1.0